DNA methods versus illegal logging

Rainforest in the Blue Mountains of Australia. J.W.C. Adams/Creative Commons.

One of Andy’s articles, recently posted on Biodiversity Revolution, has been picked up by The Conversation. It’s nice to be able to talk about a scientific solution to a serious problem: generally we just tend to worry about issues, and there’s little or nothing that we can do about them. This time, though, there’s a definite solution that will enable scientists to identify timber and track timber that’s been illegally logged, tracing it right back to the source. That means a reduction in deforestation, particularly in the most vulnerable areas, and a crackdown on those who make ‘invisible’ money from this trade, as well as providing those with a conscience the reassurance that our timber goods have been harvested sustainably.

That’s definitely a win for the good guys.

Rainforest in Ecuador. Vilseskogen/flickr, Creative Commons

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Discovering Biodiversity and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to DNA methods versus illegal logging

  1. A great innovation and excellent to see this technology becoming part of global chain-of-custody systems like the Forest Stewardship Council — accountability assurance across the value chain. I look forward to feeling more confident about the timber products I buy, including the paper trail!

  2. Pingback: I talk to the trees to find which ones were illegally logged* | Biodiversity Revolution

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s